Allison

(PC) Sermeno v. Allison

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 9, 20192:18-cv-01039California652 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LARRY ALTAMIRANO SERMENO, No. 2:18-cv-1039-KJM-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. ORDER KATHLEEN ALLISON, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration (ECF No. 15) of the magistrate judge’s April 9, 2019 order. As provided by Eastern District of California Local Rule 303(f), a Magistrate Judge’s order shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the file, the court finds the magistrate judge’s ruling was not clearly erroneous or contrary to law. The April 9, 2019 order dismissing the complaint and granting plaintiff leave to file a first amended complaint is therefore affirmed. For good cause appearing, and as explained below, plaintiff will be provided additional time to file a first amended complaint. Plaintiff is cautioned that failure to file a first…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.