(PC) Jorgenson v. United States of America

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 10, 20191:17-cv-00817California3,957 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PAUL JORGENSON, Case No. 1:17-cv-00817-LJO-EPG (PC)

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT DEFENDANT

v. UNITED STATES BE DISMISSED FROM

THIS ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., BECAUSE OF PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO

STATE A CLAIM AND BECAUSE OF

Defendants. PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO FOLLOW

THIS COURT’S LOCAL RULES

15 (ECF NO. 75)

FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE

17 I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY Paul Jorgenson (“Plaintiff”) is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action. This case now proceeds on Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint, which was filed on July 12, 2018. (ECF No. 19). This case is proceeding on Plaintiff’s FTCA claim against the United States, his Eighth Amendment Bivens claim against the four unknown correctional officers (“the Doe Defendants”), his state tort claims for medical negligence against Defendants Haak, Randhawa, and Emanuel Medical…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.