(PC) Jorgenson v. United States of America
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 10, 20191:17-cv-00817California3,957 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
PAUL JORGENSON, Case No. 1:17-cv-00817-LJO-EPG (PC)
Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,
RECOMMENDING THAT DEFENDANT
v. UNITED STATES BE DISMISSED FROM
THIS ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., BECAUSE OF PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO
STATE A CLAIM AND BECAUSE OF
Defendants. PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO FOLLOW
THIS COURT’S LOCAL RULES
15 (ECF NO. 75)
FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE
17 I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY Paul Jorgenson (“Plaintiff”) is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action. This case now proceeds on Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint, which was filed on July 12, 2018. (ECF No. 19). This case is proceeding on Plaintiff’s FTCA claim against the United States, his Eighth Amendment Bivens claim against the four unknown correctional officers (“the Doe Defendants”), his state tort claims for medical negligence against Defendants Haak, Randhawa, and Emanuel Medical…