Kokor

(PC) Tillman v. Kokor

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 10, 20191:18-cv-01171California453 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID TILLMAN, Case No. 1:18-cv-01171-DAD-JDP Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO AMEND

v. ECF No. 24 KOKOR,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

Defendant. TO APPOINT COUNSEL ECF No. 20 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in this civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s unopposed motion to amend page 12 of his first amended complaint is granted for good cause shown. ECF No. 24. Plaintiff also moves for the court to appoint counsel. ECF No. 20. Plaintiff does not have a constitutional right to appointed counsel in this action, see Rand v. Rowland, 113 F.3d 1520, 1525 (9th Cir. 1997), and the court lacks the authority to require an attorney to represent plaintiff. See Mallard v. U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). The court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel. See 28…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.