Sullivan

(HC) Favor VEXATIOUS LITIGANT v. Sullivan

Bad Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 10, 20191:19-cv-01161California1,377 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRANDON ALEXANDER FAVOR, Case No. 1:19-cv-01161-LJO-JDP

VEXATIOUS LITIGANT

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO Petitioner, DISMISS PETITION AT SCREENING 13 v. ECF No. 1

J. W. SULLIVAN, ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION

FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Respondent. ECF No.

ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION

TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE

18 ECF No. 8 19 Petitioner Brandon Alexander Favor, a state prisoner without counsel, seeks a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Petitioner seeks relief from a “parole problem.” ECF No. 1. Petitioner lists ineffective assistance of counsel and a violation of his Miranda rights as grounds for relief. Id. at 3. Petitioner has more recently moved for a 40-day extension of time to file evidence, ECF No. 7 at 1-2, and to exclude evidence, ECF No. 8. The matter is before the court for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.