(PS) D-Q University Board of Trustees v. Williams
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 D-Q UNIVERSITY BOARD OF No. 2:19-cv-2177-JAM-EFB PS
TRUSTEES,
12 Plaintiff, ORDER AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE v. 14 MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS, et al., 15 Defendants.
17 Defendants Michael Williams and Sky Road Webb removed this action from the Yolo 18 County Superior Court. ECF No. 1. Plaintiff has moved to remand the case back to state court 19 and noticed its motion for hearing on December 11, 2019. ECF No. 8. Court records reflect that 20 defendants have not filed an opposition or statement of non-opposition to the motion.1 21 Local Rule 230(c) provides that “[n]o party will be entitled to be heard in opposition to a 22 motion at oral arguments if opposition to the motion has not been timely filed by that party.” 23 Local Rule 183, governing persons appearing in pro se, provides that failure to comply with the 24 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rules may be grounds for dismissal, judgment by 25 default, or other appropriate sanctions. Local Rule 110 provides that failure to comply with the…