(SS) Fox v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 11, 20191:19-cv-00146California11,391 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LAURA FOX, Case No. 1:19-cv-00146-LJO-SAB

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING GRANTING

v. PLAINTIFF’S SOCIAL SECURITY

APPEAL AND REMANDING ACTION FOR

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, FURTHER ADMINISTRATIVE

PROCEEDINGS

Defendant. (ECF Nos. 27, 28, 29)

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS 18 I. INTRODUCTION Laura Fox (“Plaintiff” or “Fox”), proceeding in this action through Brittany L. Keenaas as successor in interest, seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner” or “Defendant”) denying her application for disability benefits pursuant to the Social Security Act. The matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 26 On the docket, the successor’s last name is spelled as “Keenaas,” however, the correct spelling…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.