Davis

(HC) Townsel v. Davis

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 11, 20191:19-cv-01394California265 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANTHONY LETRICE TOWNSEL, ) Case No.: 1:19-cv-01394-LJO-JLT (HC) ) Petitioner, ) ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR ) RECONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR v. ) APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL ) RON DAVIS, ) (Doc. 14) Respondent. ) ) )

Petitioner has filed a motion for reconsideration of his request for appointment of counsel. (Doc. 14.) There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See, e.g., Anderson v. Heinze, 258 F.2d 479, 481 (9th Cir. 1958); Mitchell v. Wyrick, 727 F.2d 773, 774 (8th Cir. 1984). However, Title 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a)(2)(B) authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage of the case if "the interests of justice so require." See Rule 8(c), Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. On October 4, 2019, Petitioner previously filed a motion to appoint counsel, which the Court denied. (Docs. 2, 6.) Petitioner has filed a well pled petition which is currently…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.