(PS) Cleveland v. Janssen Pharmaceuticals

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 DOMINGO L. CLEVELAND, SR, No. 2:16-cv-02308 MCE AC PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, Defendant. 15 Plaintiff is proceeding in this case in pro per. The proceeding has accordingly been referred to the magistrate judge by E.D. Cal. R. 302(c)(21). On November 18, 2019, the undersigned recommended that summary judgment be granted in favor of defendant. ECF No. 111. On December 6, 2019, plaintiff timely requested an extension of time to file objections. ECF No. 112. Plaintiff asserts he needs additional time to craft his objections due to his lack of legal training and experience. Id. While plaintiff’s reasoning is minimal, the court finds it to be good cause in light of plaintiff’s pro se status, and out of an abundance of caution in favor of ensuring that this case is decided on its merits with all relevant information presented. Further, the court finds defendant would not be prejudiced by a minor delay. …