(PC) Law v. Austin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CARLOS GILBERT LAW, No. 2:17-cv-2060 JAM AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER LORI W. AUSTIN, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 6, 2019, defendants filed a motion to revoke plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status on the ground that he qualifies as a three-strikes litigant under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See ECF No. 30. Plaintiff has not responded to defendants’ motion. Plaintiff’s opposition (or statement of non-opposition) to defendants’ motion was due within twenty-one (21) days after service of the motion. See Local Rule 230(l). Granting three additional days for service of defendants’ motion on plaintiff by mail, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d), the deadline for plaintiff to submit his opposition to prison authorities for mailing1 was Monday, 25 26 Under the prison mailbox rule, a document is deemed…