Dikran

(PC) McRae v. Dikran

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 12, 20191:16-cv-01066California408 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL SCOTT McRAE, 1:16-cv-01066-LJO-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, ORDER EXTENDING APPLICATION OF

DISCOVERY/SCHEDULING ORDER OF

vs. DECEMBER 2, 2019, TO DEFENDANT

BETZ

BAIRAMIAN DIKRAN, et al., (ECF No. 35.)

Defendants.

17 Michael Scott McRae (“Plaintiff”) is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens vs. Six Unknown Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). This case now proceeds with Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint filed on March 9, 2018, against defendants Dr. Dikran Bairamian,1 Dr. Kevin Cuong Nguyen, and Dr. David Betts, for inadequate medical care under the Eighth Amendment and state law claims for medical malpractice and medical battery. (ECF No. 14.) On November 22, 2019, defendant Bairamian filed an Answer to Plaintiff’s complaint, and on December 2, 2019, the court issued a Discovery/Scheduling Order. (ECF Nos. 32, 35.)

27 1 In his original…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.