Lozovoy

(PC) Randolph v. Lozovoy

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 12, 20191:16-cv-01528California1,395 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

COLIN M. RANDOLPH, Case No. 1:16-cv-01528-DAD-EPG (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR ATTENDANCE OF

v. WITNESSES AND FOR APPOINTMENT

OF PRO BONO COUNSEL

R. LOZOVOY, (ECF NOS. 73 & 76) Defendant.

13 I. BACKGROUND Colin Randolph (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding on Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint on his claim against defendant Lozovoy for deliberate indifference to serious medical needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment. (ECF Nos. 14 & 57). On November 25, 2019, Plaintiff filed a motion for attendance of witnesses and for appointment of pro bono counsel. (ECF No. 73). On December 9, 2019, Plaintiff filed a supplement. (ECF No. 76). On December 11, 2019, Defendant filed his opposition to the motion. (ECF No. 78). Plaintiff’s motion is now before…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.