Sexton

(PC) Harris v. Sexton

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 12, 20191:18-cv-00080California2,000 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EARNEST S. HARRIS, No. 1:18-cv-0080 KJM DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

SEXTON, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff alleges use of the Guard One Security Check system at California State Prison-Corcoran (“CSP-Corcoran”) deprived him of sleep in violation of the Eighth Amendment. Currently before the court is plaintiff’s second motion for an emergency injunction and his motion to compel. BACKGROUND I. Allegations of the Second Amended Complaint Plaintiff is incarcerated at CSP-Corcoran in the security housing unit. He alleges that defendants are responsible for the implementation and use of the Guard One Security Check system there. That system requires officers to touch a metal pipe to a metal box affixed to each cell door in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.