(SS) Urrabazo v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 12, 20191:19-cv-00248California448 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID MALDONADO URRABAZO, SR., ) Case No.: 1:19-cv-248 - JLT ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER TO DEFENDANT TO SHOW CAUSE )

WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED

v. ) ) FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, ) COURT’S ORDER ) Defendant. ) )

David Maldonado Urrabazo, Jr., seeks judicial review of a decision to denying his application for Social Security benefits. (Doc. 1) On February 21, 2019, the Court issued its Scheduling Order, setting forth the applicable deadlines. (Doc. 3) Plaintiff filed his opening brief on November 8, 2019. (Doc. 13) Pursuant to the terms of the Scheduling Order, within thirty days of the filing of the opening brief, the Commissioner was to file a response. (Doc. 3 at 2) To date, the Commissioner has not filed a responsive brief, and the Commissioner did not request an extension of time to comply with the Court’s order. The Local Rules, corresponding with Fed. R. Civ. P. 11, provide: “Failure of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.