(PS) Hernandez v. City of Stockton

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 12, 20192:18-cv-01316California415 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL HERNANDEZ, No. 2:18-cv-1316-JAM-EFB PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

CITY OF STOCKTON, et al., Defendants. 16 After this case was referred to the undersigned, the court issued an order setting a status conference on November 20, 2019. ECF No. 37. The order also directed the parties to file, by no later than November 6, 2019, status reports addressing the future scheduling of the case. Id. Defendants timely filed a joint status report (ECF No. 39), but plaintiff failed to file a status report. Accordingly, the status conference was continued, and plaintiff was ordered, by no later than December 4, 2019, to file a status report and to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed for his failure to file a status report. ECF No. 40. Plaintiff was also admonished that failure to comply with the order could result in the imposition of sanctions, including a recommendation that this action be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.