CDCR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GEORGE E. JACOBS, Case No.: 1:17-cv-01599-DAD-JLT (PC)

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

TO DISMISS ACTION

v. 21-DAY DEADLINE CDCR, et al.,

Defendants. 16 George E. Jacobs alleges that the defendants failed to provide adequate medical care and subjected him to excessive force. (Doc. 23). In two screening orders, the Court cautioned Plaintiff that Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 20 prohibits him from bringing unrelated claims against unrelated parties in a single action.1 (Doc. 14 at 4-5; Doc. 19 at 3, 5-6.) The Court further warned Plaintiff that his first amended complaint (FAC) was excessively long and violated Rule 8 and instructed him to make his second amended complaint (SAC) “as concise as possible.” (Doc. 19 at 4.) The Court provided Plaintiff with the pleading requirements and legal standards for his alleged claims and granted him leave to amend. (Id.)

1 Mr. Jacobs is well-aware of the pleading standards because the Court has…