Mimms

(PC) Taylor v. Mimms

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 13, 20191:18-cv-01356California918 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHAUNTAE TAYLOR, Case No. 1:18-cv-01356-AWI-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS

v. ACTION FOR FAILURE TO STATE A

CLAIM

MIMMS, et al., (ECF No. 19) Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Shauntae Taylor (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On September 13, 2019, the assigned Magistrate Judge issued findings and recommendations recommending dismissal of this action for failure to state a cognizable section 1983 claim. (ECF No. 19.) Those findings and recommendations were served on Plaintiff and contained notice that any objections thereto were to be filed within fourteen (14) days after service. (Id. at 13.) On October 7, 2019, after the expiration of the deadline, Plaintiff filed his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.