Lake

(PC) Cagan v. Lake

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 13, 20191:19-cv-01629California2,806 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MAXCIME CAGAN, Case No. 1:19-cv-01629-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE

v. TO THIS ACTION S. LAKE, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION

Defendants. FOR FAILURE TO STATE A COGNIZABLE

CLAIM FOR RELIEF

16 (ECF No. 1)

THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE

18 Plaintiff Maxcime Cagan is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). Currently before the Court for screening is Plaintiff’s complaint, filed on November 15, 2019. (ECF No. 1.) I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.