Seitz

(PC) Lipsey v. Seitz

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 16, 20191:18-cv-00766California2,680 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRISTOPHER LIPSEY, JR., Case No.: 1:18-cv-00766-AWI-SKO (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO

FILE A THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT

v. OR NOTIFY THE COURT OF HIS DESIRE

TO PROCEED ONLY ON CLAIM FOUND

B. SEITZ, et al., COGNIZABLE

Defendants. (Doc. 21)

21-DAY DEADLINE

17 Plaintiff Christopher Lipsey, Jr., an inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, alleges that the defendants retaliated against him in violation of the First Amendment and denied him access to the courts.1 (Doc. 21.) Plaintiff states a cognizable retaliation claim against Defendant B. Seitz; however, he fails state cognizable access to court claims against the remaining defendants. Therefore, the Court ORDERS Plaintiff to either file a third amended complaint curing the deficiencies in his pleading OR, in the alternative, notify the Court that he wishes to proceed only on his retaliation claim against B.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.