Seitz
(PC) Lipsey v. Seitz
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRISTOPHER LIPSEY, JR., Case No.: 1:18-cv-00766-AWI-SKO (PC)
Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO
FILE A THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT
v. OR NOTIFY THE COURT OF HIS DESIRE
TO PROCEED ONLY ON CLAIM FOUND
B. SEITZ, et al., COGNIZABLE
Defendants. (Doc. 21)
21-DAY DEADLINE
17 Plaintiff Christopher Lipsey, Jr., an inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, alleges that the defendants retaliated against him in violation of the First Amendment and denied him access to the courts.1 (Doc. 21.) Plaintiff states a cognizable retaliation claim against Defendant B. Seitz; however, he fails state cognizable access to court claims against the remaining defendants. Therefore, the Court ORDERS Plaintiff to either file a third amended complaint curing the deficiencies in his pleading OR, in the alternative, notify the Court that he wishes to proceed only on his retaliation claim against B.…