Estate of Armando Osuna v. County of Stanislaus
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 ESTATE OF ARMANDO OSUNA, et al., Case No. 1:18-cv-01240-DAD-SAB Plaintiffs, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT
TO CLOSE CASE AND REFLECT
v. VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41(a) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF COUNTY STANISLAUS, et al., CIVIL PROCEDURE Defendants. (ECF No. 37) 16 On December 13, 2019, the parties filed a stipulation dismissing this action with 18 prejudice and with each party to bear their own costs and fees. (ECF No. 37.) In light of the 19 stipulation of the parties, this action has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A) Gi); Wilson 20 v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice 21 and without an award of costs or attorney’s fees. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY ORDERED to CLOSE the file in this 23 case and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule (a).