Robles
(PC) Hicks v. Robles
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL HICKS, Case No. 1:18-cv-01481-AWI-EPG Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST
FOR COURT ORDER RE: 28 U.S.C. §
v. 1915(b)(2)
H. ROBLES, et al., (ECF NO. 86)
Defendants.
16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner who proceeded pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The parties reached a settlement agreement and filed a stipulation for the dismissal of all of Plaintiff’s claims on September 10, 2019. (ECF No. 84.) On September 30, 2019, Plaintiff filed a “Request for Court Order RE: 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2).” (ECF No. 86.) Plaintiff indicates that he owes some $7,692.45 in Prison Litigation Reform Act filing fees for 22 in forma pauperis applications and therefore asks the Court to offer an opinion as to the way section 1915(b) of the Prisoner Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”) calls for collection of installment payments from prisoners who simultaneously owe filing…