Diaz

(PC) Flow-Sunkett v. Diaz

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 16, 20191:19-cv-01528California885 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BRITTNEY FLOW-SUNKETT, 1:19-cv-01528-AWI-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT THIS CASE BE

vs. DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, FOR

FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH COURT’S

RALPH DIAZ, et al., ORDER (ECF No. 3.) Defendants.

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE IN

FOURTEEN (14) DAYS

19 I. BACKGROUND Brittney Flow-Sunkett (“Plaintiff”) is proceeding pro se with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The original Complaint was filed on June 12, 2019, as case number 1:19-cv-00816-GSA-PC (“19-816”). (Court docket.) On July 11, 2019, co-plaintiffs Glenn Sunkett and Brittney Flow-Sunkett, husband and wife, filed the First Amended Complaint in case 19-86. (Case 19-816, ECF No. 13.) On October 29, 2019, the court issued an order severing the co-plaintiffs’ claims and opening the present case for Plaintiff Brittney Flow-Sunkett (“Flow-Sunkett”). …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.