Diaz
(PC) Flow-Sunkett v. Diaz
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 16, 20191:19-cv-01528California885 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
BRITTNEY FLOW-SUNKETT, 1:19-cv-01528-AWI-GSA-PC
Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,
RECOMMENDING THAT THIS CASE BE
vs. DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, FOR
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH COURT’S
RALPH DIAZ, et al., ORDER (ECF No. 3.) Defendants.
OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE IN
FOURTEEN (14) DAYS
19 I. BACKGROUND Brittney Flow-Sunkett (“Plaintiff”) is proceeding pro se with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The original Complaint was filed on June 12, 2019, as case number 1:19-cv-00816-GSA-PC (“19-816”). (Court docket.) On July 11, 2019, co-plaintiffs Glenn Sunkett and Brittney Flow-Sunkett, husband and wife, filed the First Amended Complaint in case 19-86. (Case 19-816, ECF No. 13.) On October 29, 2019, the court issued an order severing the co-plaintiffs’ claims and opening the present case for Plaintiff Brittney Flow-Sunkett (“Flow-Sunkett”). …