Woodman

(PC) Corral v. Woodman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 16, 20192:18-cv-01769California1,586 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DYLAN SCOTT CORRAL, No. 2:18-cv-1769-KJM-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. ORDER WOODMAN, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by Eastern District of California local rules. On June 18, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections within the time specified therein. Both parties have timely filed objections to the findings and recommendations. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304(f), this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. For the reasons explained below, the court declines to adopt the recommendation that this action be dismissed. Defendant’s motion to dismiss will be denied and this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.