Murphy v. Amazon.Com, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 17, 20191:19-cv-01577California3,589 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TOM MURPHY, Case No. 1:19-cv-01577-LJO-BAM Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO

v. REMAND AND REQUEST FOR

ATTORNEYS’ FEES

AMAZON.COM, INC. (Doc. No. 6) Defendant.

FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE

12 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Tom Murphy’s (“Plaintiff”) motion to remand and request for attorneys’ fees. (Doc. No. 6.) The motion was referred to the undersigned for issuance of findings and recommendations pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302(a). The Court deemed the matter suitable for resolution without oral argument and vacated the hearing set for December 13, 2019. Local Rule 230(g). Having considered the parties’ briefing, and for the reasons that follow, the Court recommends that Plaintiff’s motion to remand and request for attorneys’ fees be denied. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff originally filed this action in the Superior Court of California…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.