Scharffenberg

(PC) Quintana v. Scharffenberg

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 17, 20191:17-cv-01418California4,473 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8 VICTOR QUINTANA, Case No. 1:17-cv-01418-LJO-EPG (PC) 9 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, RECOMMENDING THAT DEFENDANT’S v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BE GRANTED

DR. SCHARFFENBERG,

(ECF NO. 34) Defendant. OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

TWENTY-ONE DAYS

14 Victor Quintana (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding “against defendant Dr. Scharffenberg on Plaintiff’s claim for deliberate indifference to serious medical needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment.” (ECF No. 11, p. 7). On June 20, 2019, defendant Dr. Scharffenberg (“Defendant”) filed a motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 34). On July 19, 2019, Plaintiff filed his opposition. (ECF No. 38). Defendant filed his reply on July 26, 2019. (ECF No. 39). Defendant’s motion for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.