Matevousian

(PC) Benanti v. Matevousian

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 17, 20191:17-cv-01556California5,056 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL BENANTI, ) Case No. 1:17-cv-01556-LJO-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO v. ) CORRECT SPELLING OF DEFENDANTS

ALATARY AND CASTANADA’S NAMES

MATEVOUSIAN, ) ) Defendants. ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION ) REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR ) SUMMARY JUDGMENT ) ) [ECF No. 68]

Plaintiff Michael Benanti is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Currently before the Court is Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, filed August 26, 2019. /// /// /// /// /// /// I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND This action is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.