Vera

(PC) Chatman v. Vera

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 17, 20191:18-cv-01463California391 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

AUDREE CHATMAN, ) Case No.: 1:18-cv-01463-DAD-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION v. ) FOR POSTPONENT, AND GRANTING

EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A RESPONSE

H. VERA, ) TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY ) JUDGMENT Defendant. ) ) [ECF No. 30] ) ) )

Plaintiff Audree Chatman is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for postponement of the case, filed December 16, 2019. Plaintiff requests a postponement of the case due to his mental health condition and treatment at the acute level of care. The United States Supreme Court has indicated that “the power to stay proceedings is incidental to the power inherent in every court to control the disposition of the causes on its docket with economy of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.