Sims

(PS) Petersen v. Sims

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 17, 20191:19-cv-00138California313 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 KYLE PETERSEN , Case No.: 1:19-cv-00138-DAD-EPG

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION REQUESTING THE COURT TAKE

JUDICIAL NOTICE

ANTHONY SIMS, JR., and NICHOLAS TORRES, (ECF No. 34) Defendants.

16 Plaintiff, Kyle Petersen, is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action, pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). Plaintiff has filed a motion requesting that the Court take judicial notice of a related criminal case. (ECF No. 34.) The Court previously issued a Screening Order in which the Court took judicial notice of the same criminal case that is the subject of Plaintiff’s motion, United States v. Peterson, No. 1:17-cr- 00255-LJO-SKO. (ECF No. 14 at 6 n.1.) Accordingly, Plaintiff’s request that the Court take judicial notice of the related criminal case is moot. However, to the extent Plaintiff requests judicial notice of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.