Petersen

Petersen v. Buyard

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 17, 20191:19-cv-00235California559 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KYLE PETERSEN, No. 1:19-cv-00235-DAD-EPG Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

MEKISHA ROBERSON-BUYARD, (Doc. Nos. 16, 17, 19, 20) Defendant.

16 Plaintiff Kyle Petersen is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On October 4, 2019, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, recommending that this action be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. (Doc. No. 16.) The findings and recommendations were mailed to plaintiff and contained notice that any objections thereto were to be filed within thirty days of service. (Id.) On October 9, 2019, plaintiff filed a request, which the court construes as a motion for leave to file an amended…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.