Nakashyan

(PC) Tate v. Nakashyan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 17, 20191:19-cv-01211California2,391 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DEREK TATE, Case No. 1:19-cv-01211-EPG (PC) 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S v. MOTION FOR REMAND BE GRANTED, THAT THIS CASE BE REMANDED TO STATE

DOCTOR DIANA NAKASHYAN,

COURT, AND THAT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

Defendant. FOR CLARIFICATION BE DENIED AS MOOT

16 (ECF NOS. 1, 4, & 10)

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

DAYS

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO ASSIGN

DISTRICT JUDGE

22 Plaintiff Derek Tate proceeds pro se in this action against Defendant Diana Nakashyan for claims under California law. Defendant removed the case to this Court on September 3, 2019, claiming that Plaintiff’s Complaint “potentially” states claims under the First and Eighth Amendment. (ECF No. 1.) Defendant filed a request that the Court screen Plaintiff’s Complaint, which the Court granted. (ECF…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.