(PC) Driver v. ADA 1824 Panels

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 17, 20191:19-cv-01718California1,405 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 BILLY DRIVER, JR., Case No. 1:19-cv-01718-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

RANDOMLY ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE TO

v. ACTION ADA 1824 PANELS, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING PLAINTIFF’S

Defendants. APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED

IN FORMA PAUPERIS BE DENIED

13 (ECF No. 4)

THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE

15 Plaintiff Billy Driver, Jr. is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff initiated this action on December 10, 2019. (ECF No. 4) Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, filed on December 10, 2019. (ECF No. 4.) I. LEGAL STANDARD The Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (“PLRA”) was enacted “to curb frivolous prisoner complaints and appeals.” Silva v. Di Vittorio, 658 F.3d 1090,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.