(PS) Bruzzone v. Intel Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 17, 20192:18-cv-00865California4,199 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL A. BRUZZONE, No. 2:18-cv-0865 KJM DB PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS INTEL CORPORATION, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff Michael Bruzzone is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Pending before the undersigned are defendants’ motions to dismiss the second amended complaint and defendants’ motions to declare plaintiff a vexatious litigant. (ECF Nos. 45 & 48.) For the reasons stated below, the undersigned will recommend that defendants’ motions to dismiss be granted, the second amended complaint be dismissed without leave to amend, and defendants’ motions to declare plaintiff a vexatious litigant be denied. BACKGROUND Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, commenced this action on April 10, 2018, by filing a complaint and a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF Nos. 1 & 2.) …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.