Tate

(PC) Womack v. Tate

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 18, 20191:19-cv-00614California978 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RODNEY JEROME WOMACK, No. 1:19-cv-00614-DAD-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, DENYING

H. TATE, et al., PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO PROCEED IN

FORMA PAUPERIS

Defendants. (Doc. Nos. 7, 8)

17 Plaintiff Rodney Jerome Womack is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On May 20, 2019, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, recommending that plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) be denied pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and that plaintiff be required to pay the $400.00 filing fee in full to proceed with this action. (Doc. No. 8.) Those findings and recommendations were served on plaintiff and contained notice that any objections thereto were to be filed within…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.