Mertes

Mertes v. Internal Revenue Service

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 18, 20191:19-cv-01218California520 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BILLIE MERTES, No. 1:19-cv-01218-AWI-SKO Plaintiff,

SCHEDULING ORDER

v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Defendant. 16 17 On December 17, 2019, a scheduling conference was held. Christian Speck, Esq. and 18 Douglas Youmans, Esq. appeared telephonically on behalf of Plaintiff. Emily Miller, Esq., 19 appeared telephonically on behalf of Defendant. 20 The Court set the following deadlines:1 21 1. The parties shall meet and confer to attempt to narrow the issues by no later than 22 January 21, 2020. 23 2. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment shall be filed by no later than February 24 25 1 As discussed with the parties, the Court will set a schedule consisting solely of summary judgment briefing deadlines, at this time, and a status conference to set further dates if the case is not resolved on the parties’ summary judgment motions. For good cause shown, and because this case is brought under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 26 552, discovery is stayed pending the ruling on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.