Barcus

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PORFIRIO LAMARQUE, Case No.: 1:18-cv-01234 DAD JLT (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO DISMISS ACTION WITHOUT

v. PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO

COMPLY WITH COURT ORDER

JIM BARCUS, et al,

FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE

Defendants.

Plaintiff’s first amended complaint was screened recently, and he was directed to submit a notice as to whether he wishes to stand on his pleading, to proceed with it as screened, or to file a second amended complaint. (Doc. 17.) Plaintiff was provided a thirty-day response period, and he was specifically informed that if he did not submit an amended pleading or a notice, then the Court would recommend that this action be dismissed for failure to obey a court order. The deadline to submit a response has now passed, and plaintiff has not submitted a notice or otherwise responded to the order. Accordingly, the Court RECOMMENDS that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule…