(PC) Long v. Corizon Health, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 20, 20191:17-cv-00898California1,025 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11 PHILLIP J. LONG, CASE NO. 1:17-cv-0898-LJO-JLT (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER VACATING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; AND v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR CORIZON HEALTH, INC., et al., SUBPOENA 15 Defendants. (Docs. 18, 20)

17 This action proceeds against a single Jane Doe defendant on an Eighth Amendment 18 medical indifference claim. (Docs. 11, 12.) Previously, the Court granted Plaintiff an extended 19 period to identify Jane Doe, directing Plaintiff to file a notice of substitution once she has been 20 identified. The Court also informed Plaintiff that if he failed to comply with the directive, the 21 Court would recommend that this action be dismissed. When that ninety-day period passed 22 without notice by Plaintiff, the Court issued findings and recommendations to dismiss this action 23 without prejudice for failure to comply with a court order and failure to prosecute. Plaintiff has 24 since filed objections to the findings and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.