Niehus

(PC) Harrison v. Niehus

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 20, 20191:17-cv-01120California863 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARCUS HARRISON, Case No. 1:17-cv-01120-LJO-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO ALTER AND/OR AMEND JUDGMENT

v. PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 59(e) S. NIEHUS, et al., (ECF No. 17) Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Marcus Harrison is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 9, 2019, the assigned Magistrate Judge issued findings and recommendations recommending dismissal of this action, with prejudice, for failure to state a cognizable claim upon which relief may be granted. (ECF No. 13.) Plaintiff timely filed written objections on September 23, 2019. (ECF No. 14.) On November 20, 2019, the undersigned adopted the September 9, 2019 findings and recommendations in full and dismissed this action, with prejudice, for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. (ECF No. 15.) Currently…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.