Diaz

(HC) Hundal v. Diaz

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 20, 20191:19-cv-00338California502 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAMANJIT SINGH HUNDAL, No. 1:19-cv-00338-DAD-JLT (HC) Petitioner, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

RALPH DIAZ, (Doc. Nos. 12, 17, 19, 20) Respondent.

16 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On September 6, 2019, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, recommending that respondent’s motion to dismiss be denied as moot, petitioner’s withdrawn request for a stay also be denied as moot, and petitioner’s motion to amend be granted in part. (Doc. No. 20.) The findings and recommendations were served on all parties and contained notice that any objections thereto were to be filed within twenty-one (21) days from the date of service. No objections have been filed and the time in which to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.