(SS) Sweeney v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 20, 20192:18-cv-02495California5,248 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ELISA M. SWEENEY, No. 2:18-cv-02495 KJM AC Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant.

17 Plaintiff seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”), denying her application for disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 401-34, and for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) under Title XVI of the Social Security Act (“the Act”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 1381-1383f.1 This Social Security matter was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(15). For the reasons that follow, the undersigned recommends plaintiff’s motion for 24 DIB is paid to disabled persons who have contributed to the Disability Insurance Program, and who suffer from a mental or physical disability. 42 U.S.C. § 423(a)(1); Bowen v. City of New York, 476 U.S. 467, 470 (1986). SSI is paid to financially needy…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.