(SS)Parrott

(SS)Parrott v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 20, 20192:18-cv-02714California3,997 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARY T. PARROTT, No. 2:18-cv-2714-KJN Plaintiff, ORDER ON PARTIES’ CROSS MOTIONS

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

v. (ECF Nos. 13, 18) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

15 Defendant. 16 Plaintiff seeks judicial review of a final decision by the Commissioner of Social Security denying her application for Disability Insurance Benefits. In her summary judgment motion, Plaintiff contends the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) erred by failing to apply the proper standards when evaluating fibromyalgia claims, as well as failing to properly assess other medical and lay opinions. The Commissioner opposed, and filed a cross–motion for summary judgment. After considering the parties’ written briefing, the record, and the applicable law, the Court DENIES the Commissioner’s cross-motion for summary judgment, GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, and REMANDS the case for further proceedings. /// /// 27 1 This action was referred to the undersigned pursuant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.