(HC) Villarreal v. People of the State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 20, 20192:18-cv-03239California563 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LIONZO ANGEL VILLARREAL, No. 2:18-cv-03239-TLN-EFB Petitioner, v. ORDER THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF

CALIFORNIA,

15 Respondent. 16 Petitioner Lionzo Angel Villarreal (“Petitioner”), a state prisoner proceeding through counsel, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On September 25, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on Petitioner and which contained notice to Petitioner that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 3.) Petitioner has not filed any objections to the Findings and Recommendations. Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.