Vega

(PC) Arendas v. Vega

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 20, 20192:19-cv-01332California1,603 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PETER JOHN ARENDAS, No. 2:19-cv-01332-TLN-EFB Plaintiff, v. ORDER DUSTIN VEGA, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff Peter John Arendas (“Plaintiff”), a county inmate proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On September 25, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 9.) Plaintiff submitted a letter (ECF No. 10) and filed two sets of objections to the Findings and Recommendations (ECF Nos. 11, 12). This Court reviews de novo those portions of the proposed findings of fact to which objection has been made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.