(PS) Bridgeman v. San Joaquin Child Protective Services
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 REGINNA BRIDGEMAN, No. 2:19-cv-02108 JAM AC PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SAN JOAQUIN CHILD PROTECTIVE
SERVICES,
14 Defendant.
16 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. The action was accordingly referred to the undersigned for pretrial matters by E.D. Cal. R. (“Local Rule”) 302(c)(21). On November 1, 2019, the court granted plaintiff’s in forma pauperis (“IFP”) application but rejected the complaint, granting plaintiff 30 days to file an amended complaint. ECF No. 3. Plaintiff was cautioned that failure to do so could lead to a recommendation that the action be dismissed. Plaintiff did not file an amended complaint within the time limit. On December 4, 2019, the court issued an order to show cause within 14 days why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. ECF No. 4. Plaintiff has not responded to the court’s orders, nor taken any action to prosecute this case. Therefore, IT IS…