Harris

(PC) Davis v. Harris

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 23, 20192:19-cv-01976California1,849 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 RONNELL DAVIS, No. 2:19-cv-1976-JAM-EFB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER M. FELDER, et al., Defendants. 15 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in this action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. 2. Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis The court has reviewed plaintiff’s application and finds that it makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). Accordingly, plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. Screening I. Legal Standards Pursuant to § 1915(e)(2), the court must dismiss the case at any time if it determines the allegation of poverty is untrue, or if the action is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief against an immune defendant. Although pro se pleadings are liberally construed, see…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.