(PS) Aussieker v. Staccato Properties, LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARK AUSSIEKER and KIMBERLY No. 2:19-cv-0089 TLN DB PS
AUSSIEKER,
12 Plaintiffs, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. STACCATO PROPERTIES, LLC, et al., Defendants. 17 Plaintiffs Mark Aussieker and Kimberly Aussieker are proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Pending before the court is plaintiffs’ motion for default judgement against defendant Staccato Properties, LLC, (“Staccato Properties”). (ECF No. 8.) This motion came on for hearing before the undersigned on May 17, 2019. (ECF No. 16.) Plaintiff Mark Aussieker appeared in person on his own behalf. No appearance was made by, or on behalf of plaintiff Kimberly Aussieker or the defendant. Having considered all written materials submitted with respect to the motion, and after hearing oral argument, the undersigned recommends that plaintiffs’ motion be granted. 27 1 On May 22, 2019,…