UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL FILED

on Dec 30, 2019

MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE: ROUNDUP PRODUCTS LIABILITY

LITIGATION MDL No. 2741

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO —176)

On October 3, 2016, the Panel transferred 19 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. See 214 F.Supp.3d 1346 (J.P.M.L. 2016). Since that time, 2,176 additional action(s) have been transferred to the Northern District of California. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Vince Chhabria. It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the Northern District of California and assigned to Judge Chhabria. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the Northern District of California for the reasons stated in the order of October 3, 2016, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Vince Chhabria. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7-day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

Inasmuch as no objection is FOR THE PANEL: pending at this time, the stay is lifted. LZ a Baw _ Dec 30, 2019 CLERK'S OFFICE John W. Nichols en dno copy MULTIBISTRICT LIGATION Clerk of the Panel of the original on file in my office.

ATTEST:

SUSAN SOONG

Clerk, U.S. District Court Northern District of California

Date: December 30, 2019

IN RE: ROUNDUP PRODUCTS LIABILITY

LITIGATION MDL No. 2741

SCHEDULE CTO−176 − TAG−ALONG ACTIONS

DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION

CALIFORNIA EASTERN

CAE 2 19−02299 Tullius v. Monsanto Company

CONNECTICUT

CT 3 19−01926 Petajasoja v. Monsanto Co

DELAWARE

DE 1 19−02274 Humphrey et al v. Monsanto Company

FLORIDA MIDDLE

FLM 3 19−01255 Coleman v. Monsanto Company FLM 8 19−02693 Guevara v. Monsanto Company FLM 8 19−02905 Siniff v. Monsanto Company

ILLINOIS NORTHERN

ILN 1 19−08020 Malandruccolo v. Monsanto Company ILN 1 19−08021 Hays v. Monsanto Company ILN 1 19−08022 McInnis v. Monsanto Company ILN 1 19−08024 Kelley v. Monsanto Company ILN 1 19−08157 Nault v. Monsanto Company

MISSOURI EASTERN

MOE 4 19−03073 Lewis et al v. Monsanto Company MOE 4 19−03074 Opel v. Monsanto Company MOE 4 19−03081 Wojno v. Monsanto Company MOE 4 19−03103 Aiken, Jr. v. Monsanto Company et al MOE 4 19−03107 Glaze et al v. Monsanto Company et al MOE 4 19−03217 Taylor v. Monsanto Company MOE 4 19−03218 Roach v. Monsanto Company

OHIO NORTHERN

OHN 3 19−02661 Wistinghausen et al v. Monsanto Company

SOUTH CAROLINA

SC 4 19−03509 Ward v. Monsanto Company

TENNESSEE EASTERN

TNE 3 19−00374 Arms v. Monsanto Company (TV1)