Pulido

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KASEY F. HOFFMANN, Case No. 1:18-cv-00209-AWI-SKO (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CASE WHY ACTION

SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

v. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE

COURT’S ORDER

L. PULIDO, et al., 21-DAY DEADLINE Defendants.

16 On November 22, 2019, the Court issued a screening order requiring Plaintiff to file a first amended complaint or, in the alternative, to file a notice that he wishes to proceed only on the claims found cognizable by the Court. (Doc. 27.) The Court granted Plaintiff until December 13, 2019, to comply with its order. (See id.) Although the deadline has passed, Plaintiff has failed to file an amended complaint or a notice, or to otherwise respond to the Court’s order. The Local Rules, corresponding with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11, provide, “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply with … any order of the Court may be grounds for the imposition by the Court of any and all sanctions ……