Abdur-Rahman

(PC) Carreon v. Abdur-Rahman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 31, 20192:17-cv-01292California10,008 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTONIO CARREON, No. 2:17-cv-1292 TLN KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS &

RECOMMENDATIONS

S. ABDUR-RAHMAN, et al., Defendants. 16 I. Introduction Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pursuant to the district court’s September 28, 2018 order, this action proceeds on plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference claims against defendants Dr. S. Abdur-Rahman and Dr. Lee. On June 17, 2019, defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff filed an opposition, and defendants filed a reply. As discussed below, the undersigned recommends that defendants’ motion for summary judgment be granted in part and denied in part. //// 26 Defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiff’s retaliation claims against Dr. Abdur-Rahman was granted, and plaintiff was granted leave to amend to pursue retaliation claims against the doctor…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.