City of Fresno v. Tokio Marine Specialty Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 2, 20201:18-cv-00504California199 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8 9 CITY OF FRESNO, Case No. 1:18-cv-00504-LJO-SAB Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF THE

COURT TO CLOSE CASE AND REFLECT

v. VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41(a) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF TOKIO MARINE SPECIALTY CIVIL PROCEDURE

INSURANCE COMPANY,

(ECF No. 27) Defendant. 14 15 On December 27, 2019, a stipulation was filed dismissing this action without prejudice 17 with each party to bear its own costs and fees. In light of the stipulation of the parties, this action 18 has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(Gi); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 19 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed without prejudice and without an award of costs or 29 attorneys’ fees. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY ORDERED to CLOSE the file in this 22 case and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule (a).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.