(PC) Charles Davis v. Hanford Police Department

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 2, 20201:19-cv-01204California3,380 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 CHARLES LAKE DAVIS, 1:19-cv-01204-DAD-EPG (PC) 10 Plaintiff, ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO: 11 v. (1) FILE A FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; 12 HANFORD POLICE DEPARTMENT, et OR

al., (2) NOTIFY THE COURT THAT HE WISHES Defendants. TO STAND ON HIS COMPLAINT, SUBJECT TO FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO THE DISTRICT JUDGE CONSISTENT

WITH THIS ORDER

(ECF NO. 1)

THIRTY DAY DEADLINE 19 Plaintiff, Charles Lake Davis, is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action on September 3, 2019 (ECF No. 1). The Complaint is before the Court for screening. For the reasons described below, the Court finds that Plaintiff has failed to state a cognizable claim against Defendants. I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), in any case in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.