Vahora

Vahora v. Valley Diagnostic Laboratory Inc.

Bad Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 3, 20201:19-cv-00912California5,723 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 GULAMNABI VAHORA, Case No. 1:19-cv-00912-DAD-SKO

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

THAT DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO

v. DISMISS BE GRANTED WITHOUT

LEAVE TO AMEND

9 VALLEY DIAGNOSTICS LABORATORY, (Doc. 11) INC.,

OBJECTIONS DUE: 21 DAYS

Defendant.

_________________________________ _ /

13 I. INTRODUCTION On July 23, 2019, Defendant Valley Diagnostics Laboratory, Inc. (“VDL”) filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc. 11.) On October 2, 2019, Plaintiff filed an opposition. (Doc. 18.) On October 22, 2019, the motion was referred 18 to the undersigned for findings and recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). The 19 undersigned reviewed the briefs and supporting material and found the matter suitable for decision 20 without oral argument pursuant to Local Rule 230(g). The hearing previously set for November 21 5, 2019, which the assigned district…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.